Phase-Modulated Graviton–Higgs Coupling Tested With LIGO Strain

Authors

  • Begüm Yıldırım

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24297/jap.v24i.9908

Keywords:

model-based validation, quantum gravity, phase modulation, Hilbert transform, LIGO strain, massive gravity, Higgs coupling, graviton mass

Abstract

This paper presents a phase-modulated local Higgs-field coupling model for possible effective graviton mass acquisition in a reduced time-domain representation. The model introduces a complex analytic envelope, obtained through the Hilbert transform of a real strain-like waveform, into a hyperbolic evolution operator with a phase factor √(−i) exp(iωt). The corresponding right-hand side is written as a reduced Klein–Gordon-like response containing a second time derivative and an effective local mass-coupling term m_eff²(t) = g_H²|Φ_H(t)|². The formulation is evaluated in two stages: first with a controlled sinusoidal waveform and then with publicly available LIGO/GWOSC strain data. In both stages, the left- and right-hand sides are compared after Z-score normalization, and the mean absolute error is used as an operational compatibility metric. The revised interpretation does not claim direct detection of massive gravitons; rather, it reports model-based consistency between the proposed phase-modulated operator and normalized gravitational-wave strain-derived behavior. The results suggest that the proposed mathematical structure is suitable for further testing with multiple gravitational-wave events, detector channels, and alternative forms of Φ_H(t).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration), “Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 116, 061102, 2016. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102.

Gravitational Wave Open Science Center, “GWOSC: Gravitational-wave strain data and event releases.” Available at: https://www.gw-openscience.org.

C. de Rham, G. Gabadadze, and A. J. Tolley, “Resummation of Massive Gravity,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 106, 231101, 2011. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.231101.

C. de Rham, “Massive Gravity,” Living Reviews in Relativity, vol. 17, 7, 2014. DOI: 10.12942/lrr-2014-7.

A. S. Goldhaber and M. M. Nieto, “Photon and Graviton Mass Limits,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 82, pp. 939–979, 2010. DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.939.

The LIGO Scientific Collaboration and the Virgo Collaboration, “Tests of General Relativity with GW150914,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 116, 221101, 2016. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.221101.

P. W. Higgs, “Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 13, pp. 508–509, 1964. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.508.

F. Englert and R. Brout, “Broken Symmetry and the Mass of Gauge Vector Mesons,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 13, pp. 321–323, 1964. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.321.

A. Buonanno and B. S. Sathyaprakash, “Sources of Gravitational Waves: Theory and Observations,” in General Relativity and Gravitation: A Centennial Perspective, Cambridge University Press, 2015.

L. S. Finn, “Detection, Measurement, and Gravitational Radiation,” Physical Review D, vol. 46, pp. 5236–5249, 1992. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.46.5236.

B. F. Schutz, “Determining the Hubble Constant from Gravitational Wave Observations,” Nature, vol. 323, pp. 310–311, 1986. DOI: 10.1038/323310a0.

N. E. Huang et al., “The Empirical Mode Decomposition and the Hilbert Spectrum for Nonlinear and Non-Stationary Time Series Analysis,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A, vol. 454, pp. 903–995, 1998. DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1998.0193.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-06

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Phase-Modulated Graviton–Higgs Coupling Tested With LIGO Strain. (2026). JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN PHYSICS, 24, 81-85. https://doi.org/10.24297/jap.v24i.9908

Similar Articles

11-20 of 136

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.