Free Disturbance Propagation and the Primitive Analog of c in the Scalar Relational UEF Model

Authors

  • Czesław Grochowina None

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24297/z3mkyh54

Keywords:

primitive c analog, constant propagation speed, free disturbance propagation, Universal Energy Field

Abstract

This paper examines free disturbance propagation in the scalar relational model of the Universal Energy Field (UEF), proposed within an energistic ontology. The UEF is treated as a pre-spatiotemporal substratum whose stable localized formations may later be described as condensates. The present study focuses on the undisturbed background sector and asks whether small perturbations of the UEF can obey a well-defined propagation law. Starting from the primitive dynamical equation, the analysis fixes the regime parameter, selects a stationary background, linearizes around that background, and uses spectral decomposition of the relational coupling matrix. It is shown that a spectrum alone is not sufficient to define propagation: a regular large-scale relational sector is also required, allowing normal modes to be labelled by an emergent wave number. Under a normalized positive Laplacian-type coupling, the long-wavelength limit yields a relativistic-type dispersion relation. In the gapless sector, the group velocity becomes constant. This constant is interpreted not as the speed of light in pre-given spacetime, but as a primitive precursor of c.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Almalki, A. M., AlQarni, A., Bakodah, H., & Alshaery, A. (2024). Numerical Validation of Certain Cubic-Quartic Optical Structures Associated with the Class of Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation. Symmetry, 17, 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17010051
[2] Bru, J., Pedra, W., & Lopes, A. O. (2026). Abstract Theory of Bogoliubov Linearizations with Application to Nonlinear Thermodynamic Formalism. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2605.23576
[3] Burago, D., Ivanov, S., & Kurylev, Y. (2013). A graph discretization of the Laplace-Beltrami operator. arXiv: Analysis of PDEs. https://doi.org/10.4171/jst/83
[4] Caughey, T. (1962). Equivalent Linearization Techniques. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 35, 1706-1711. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1918794
[5] Chen, H., & Zhang, F. (2007). Resistance distance and the normalized Laplacian spectrum. Discret. Appl. Math., 155, 654-661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2006.09.008
[6] Cooperstein, B.N, (2015), Advanced Linear Algebra, , doi: 10.1201/B18403.
[7] Dupuis, N., Dupuis, N., & Sengupta, K. (2008). Non-perturbative renormalization-group approach to lattice models. The European Physical Journal B, 66, 271-278. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2008-00417-1
[8] Grochowina, C. (2026). A New Realism and Ontology for Quantum Foundations with an Initial Formalization Attempt. JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN PHYSICS, 24, 62-69. https://doi.org/10.24297/jap.v24i.9892
[9] J. Jost, “Dynamical Networks”, doi: 10.1007/978-1-84628-780-0_3.
[10] Kaiser, D. (2010). Conformal transformations with multiple scalar fields. Physical Review D, 81, 084044.https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.81.084044
[11] Kannan, M., & Pragada, S. (2020). On the construction of cospectral graphs for the adjacency and the normalized Laplacian matrices. Linear and Multilinear Algebra, 70, 3009 - 3030. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081087.2020.1821594
[12] Kukkar, A., Kumar, S., Malik, S., Murad, M., Arnous, A., Biswas, A., Yıldırım, Y., & Alshomrani, A. (2024). Lie symmetry analysis of cubic–quartic optical solitons having cubic–quintic–septic–nonic form of self-phase modulation structure. Journal of Optics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12596-024-01922-x
[13] Lukas, A., (2022). The Oxford Linear Algebra for Scientists, doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198844914.001.0001.
[14] Taylor, M. E. (2011). The Laplace Equation and Wave Equation, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7055-8_2.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Free Disturbance Propagation and the Primitive Analog of c in the Scalar Relational UEF Model. (2026). JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN PHYSICS, 24, 188-195. https://doi.org/10.24297/z3mkyh54