Portentous And Conflicting Legacies In Theoretical Physics, Cosmology And In Ruling Ideas


  • Abdul Malek TECHNOLOGIE DMI 980 Rue Robert, Brossard, Québec J4X 1C9, Canada



Contradictions , Dialectics, Universal Gravitation, Centrifugal, Centripetal, Kepler’s Laws, Planetary Motion


Kepler’s Laws of planetary motion (following the Copernican revolution in cosmology), according to Leibniz and his follower Hegel, for the first-time in history discovered the keys to what Hegel called the absolute mechanics mediated by dialectical laws, which drives the celestial bodies, in opposition to finite mechanics in terrestrial Nature developed by mathematical and empirical sciences, but that are of very limited scope. Newton wrongly extended and imposed finite mechanics on the absolute mechanics of the cosmic bodies in the form of his Law of one-sided Universal Gravitational Attraction, by distorting and misrepresenting Kepler’s profound laws and in opposition to Leibniz’s more appropriate “Radial Planetary Orbital Equation”. The still-prevailing error by Newton (notwithstanding his well known manipulation of science for selfish ends), not only shows the limitation of mathematical idealism and prejudice driven modern cosmology in the form of Einstein’s theories of relativity; but also, have made gaining positive knowledge of the cosmos an impossibility and has impaired social/historical development of humanity by reinforcing decadent ruling ideas. Hegel’s Naturphilosophie is not only a protest against the misrepresentation of Kepler’s Laws in particular; his Enzyklopädie der Philosophischem Wissenschaften is the negation and the direct rebuttal of Newtonian physics and Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica, in general. Modern natural science ignores Leibniz and Hegel at its own peril! Kepler’s phenomenological laws of planetary motion and the dialectical insights of Leibnitz and Hegel opens the way for gaining positive knowledge of the dynamics, structure and the evolution of the cosmic bodies and other cosmic phenomena; without invoking mysteries and dark/black cosmic entities, which has been the pabulum of official astrophysics and cosmology so far.


Download data is not yet available.


Petry, M.J. (ed.), “Hegel and Newtonianism” (1993), Dordrecht & London, Foreword, p. XI.

Malek, A., “Conceptual Defect of Universal Gravitation or ‘Free Fall’. A Dialectical Reassessment of Kepler’s Laws.” (2017), J. Adv, Phys., Vol. 13(5), 4876 – 4880.

Malek, A., “The Philosophy of Space – Time” (2016), Agamee Prakashani, Dhaka.

Malek, A., “The Dialectical Universe” (2012), Agamee Prakashani, Dhaka.

(a) Aiton, E.J., “An Episode in the History of Celestial Mechanics” (1996), in Learn from the Masters, Ed., F. J. Swetz, Mathematical Association of America, page 269.

(b) Tombe, F.D. Tombe, “Leibniz's Radial Planetary Orbital Equation” (2017),'s_Radial_Planetary_Orbital_Equation

Hegel, G.W.F, Encyclopaedia of the Philosophical Sciences, source Marxists.Org

Hegel, G.W.F.,“Logic” (2014), Trans. William Wallace, The Claredon Press, Oxford.

Hegel, G.W.F.,“Philosophy of Nature”(1970), tr. A. V. Miller

Hegel, G.W.F.“Philosophy of Mind” (1894) , tr. William Wallace,; rev. by A. V. Miller, 1971; rev. 2007 by Michael Inwood

Hegel, G.W.F., Briefe, 373 (2014). Quoted in Bibliographical Notice on the three Editions and three Prefaces of the Encyclopedia, xiv, G.W.F. Hegel, “The Science of Logic”, Trans. William Wallace, The Claredon Press, Oxford.

Findlay, J.N., “Hegel and the Philosophy of Physics” (1973). In: J.J. O’Malley, K.W. Algozin, H.P. Kainz, L.C. Rice (eds) The Legacy of Hegel. Springer, Dordrecht.

The Cambridge Companion to Hegel and Nineteenth-Century Philosophy (2008), edited by Frederick C. Beiser. Cambridge University Press, New York and Cambridge (UK).

Posch, T.,” Hegel’s Criticism of Newton's Physics (2004): A Reconsideration “, Oxford Conference on “Hegel and British Thought“, 2nd-3rd Sept.

Paulucci, H., “Hegel and the Celestial Mechanics of Newton and Einstein” (1984), in Hegel and the Sciences, Eds. R.S. Cohen and M.W. Wartofsky,

Findlay, J.N., “Hegel: A Re-Examination” (2013), Pub. Routledge, Oxon, N.Y.

Ellis, G. and Silk, J., "Scientific method: Defend the integrity of physics" (2014), Nature Comment, 16 December.

Quoted by H. Paulucci, “Hegel and the Celestial Mechanics of Newton and Einstein”, p-56 in Ref. 9

Quoted by T. Posch in Ref. 10

Einstein, A., “Essays in Science” (1934), Translated by Alan Harris from “Mein Weltbild, Quedro Verlag, Amsterdam, 1933), The Wisdom Library, N.Y., p48 – 49.

Tegmark, M., “Our Mathematical Universe” (2014), Penguin Random House.

Engels, F. Anti Dühring (1939), International Publishers N.Y., p. 45-46..

Hegel, G.W.F, Dissertatio Philosophica de Orbitis Planetarum – Philosophische Erörterung über die Planetenbahnen (2006 (Acta humaniora VCH, Weinheim), Jena, 1801 translated from the Latin original by David Healan Berlin and Yokohama.

Malek, A., “Ambartsumian, Arp and the Breeding Galaxies (2005), Apeiron, vol. 12, no. 2, 256 – 271.

Malek, A., “Real/Virtual Exchange of Quantum Particles as a Basis for the Resolution of Wave-Particle Duality and Other Anomalies of the Quantum Phenomena” (2014), Progress in Physics, v10, issue 4, 209-211.

Acknowledgements: Desmos Graphing Calculator available online was used in Fig. [A] and Fig [B]. The author is grateful to Mr. Faiyaz Zaman of the University of Ottawa, Canada, for technical assistance.




How to Cite

Malek, A. (2021). KEPLER – NEWTON – LEIBNIZ – HEGEL : Portentous And Conflicting Legacies In Theoretical Physics, Cosmology And In Ruling Ideas. JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN PHYSICS, 19, 221–232.