Variable Schwa Deletion in French of Orléans: The Role of Age as a Sociolinguistic Factor: A CORPUS STUDY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24297/jal.v13i.9305Keywords:
schwa, ESLO corpus, elision, French of Orléans, Clitics, Age as a sociolinguistic factorAbstract
The present paper is a micro diachronic and a socio-comparative study which examines the behaviour of a well-known pronunciation variant in French, the so-called schwa. The aim of it is to understand the nature of this variation (elision and maintenance) in monosyllabic words; clitics (#c(ə)#c) in French of Orléans, considering age as a sociolinguistic factor leading to this simplification process. Also, the evolution of the variational behaviour of this vowel in the same context across a diachronic interval of forty years (from 1968 till 2014) will be studied.
To achieve the research objectives, a corpus-based research procedure was implemented, using ESLO Corpus “Enquête Sociolinguistique à Orléans”. It is divided into two sub-corpora ESLO 1 (collected between 1969 and 1974) and ESLO 2 (collected starting from 2014). Based on the findings, it comes clear that the young generation drops more frequently schwa in their spontaneous speech. Their rate of elision was higher in both corpora compared to the one of the old speakers (34,6%, for the old generation compared to 41,7% for the young one). Yet, it is found that the increase of schwa deletion through the diachronic period of forty years is not highly significant. However, it was found that schwa deletion is conditioned by other linguistic and sociolinguistic variables which have not been addressed in this research paper. Consequently, the discussion is left for future research.
Downloads
References
Abouda, L., & Skrovec, M. (2016). Du rapport entre formes synthétique et analytique du futur – Etude de la variable modale dans un corpus oral micro-diachronique. Revue de sémantique et pragmatique, 38(38), 35-57. Doi : https://doi.org/10.4000/rsp.512. https://journals.openedition.org/rsp/512
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2022). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.2.21, retrieved 1 October 2022 from http://www.praat.org/
Bürki, A., Fougeron, C., & Gendro, C. (2007). On the categorical nature of the process involved in schwa elision in french. Présenté à 8th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association. Belgique.Doi:10.21437/Interspeech.2007-359. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221484779_On_the_categorical_nature_of_the_process_involved_in_schwa_elision_in_French
Connine, C. M., Ranbom, L. J., & Patterson, D. J. (2008). Processing variant forms in spoken word recognition: The role of variant frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 403–411. Doi: 10.3758/pp.70.3.403. https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/PP.70.3.403
Dalby, J. M. (1986). Phonetic structure of fast speech in American English. In Phonetics and Phonology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistic.
Delattre, P. (1951). Le jeu de l’e instable intérieur en français. The French Review, 24 (4), 341-351. Doi : https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112416105-002
Dubois, S., & Horvath, B., (1998). Let’s think about dat: Interdental fricatives in Cajun English. Language Variation and Change 10: 2 45.
Durand, J., & Laks, B. (2000). Relire les phonologues du Français. Maurice Grammont et la loi des trois consonnes. Langue Française. 126 : 21- 38. Doi : 10.3406/lfr.2000.4670. https://www.persee.fr/doc/lfr_0023-8368_2000_num_126_1_4670
Eckert, P. (1998). Age as a sociolinguistic variable. Coulmas (ed.). The Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Oxford/Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 151-67. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405166256.ch9. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/9781405166256.ch9
Eychenne, J., & Durand, J. (2006). Aspects de la phonologie du schwa dans le français contemporain optimalité, visibilité prosodique. Gradience. 2 vol. (399 f.). Doi : http://julieneychenne.info/files/pdf/Eychenne_these.pdf
Fouche, P.(1959). Traité de prononciation française. Paris: Klincksieck.
Gimson, A. C., Cruttenden, A., & M.Rubanyi, G. (2001). Gimson’s Pronunciation of English (6th Edition). Hodder Arnold. Doi : 10.1017/S0025100303231121
Grammont, M. (1963). Traité pratique de prononciation française (2nd Edition). Paris: Delagrave. https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k145548g.texteImage
Hansen, A. B. (2000). Le E caduc interconsonantique en tant que variable sociolinguistique. Linx, 42. Doi: 10.4000/linx.777. https://journals.openedition.org/linx/777
Johnson, K. (2004). Massive Reduction In Conversational American English. In: K. Yoneyama and K. Maekawa. Spontaneous Speech: Data and Analysis. Proceedings of the 1st Session of the 10th International Symposium, 29-54. Tokyo, Japan: The National International Institute for Japanese Language. https://buckeyecorpus.osu.edu/pubs/Massive.pdf
Kuijpers, C., van Donselaar, W., & Cutler, A. (1996). Phonological variation: Epenthesis and deletion of schwa in Dutch. Proceedings of ICSLP, Philadelphia, USA (pp. 149–152). http://www.asel.udel.edu/icslp/cdrom/vol1/315/a315.pdf
Labov, W. (1963). The social motivation of a sound change, word. (19:3),
-309. Doi: 10.1080/00437956.1963.11659799. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00437956.1963.11659799?needAccess=true
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistics Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press (1976) Sociolinguistique. Paris : Editions de Minuit.
Leon, Pierre R. (1997). Prononciation du français standard (1st Edition). 1966.
Liégeois, L.(2014). Usage des variables phonologiques dans un corpus d’interactions naturelles parents-enfant : impact du bain linguistique et dispositifs cognitifs d’apprentissage. Linguistique. Universit ́e Blaise Pascal - Clermont-Ferrand II, 2014. Francais. NNT :2014CLF20016. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01108764
Martinet, A. (1972). La nature phonologique d’e caduc. Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics to the Memory of Pierre Delattre, La Haye, Mouton, p. 393-399. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110803877-032
Malécot A. (1976). The Effect of Linguistic and Paralinguistic Variables on the Elision of the French Mute-e. Phonetica 33, 93-112. Doi : https://doi.org/10.1159/000259716
Milroy, L., & Gordon, M. (2003). Sociolinguistics, Method and interpretation. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing Company. Doi : 10.1002/9780470758359
Peretz-juillard ,C. (1977). Les Voyelles orales à Paris dans la dynamique des âges et de la société. Thèse de IIIème cycle, non publiée. Université de Paris V.
Pulgram, E. (1961). French /ə/: Statics and dynamics of linguistic subcodes, in Lingua, 10, p. 305-325.
Racine, I., & Grosjean, F. (2000). Influence de l’effacement du schwa sur la reconnaissance des mots en parole continue. L’Année Psychologique, 100, 393–417. Doi : https://doi.org/10.3406/psy.2000.28649. https://www.persee.fr/doc/psy_0003-5033_2000_num_100_3_28649
Spinelli, E., & Gros-Balthazard, F. (2007). Phonotactic constraints help to overcome effects of schwa deletion in French. Cognition, 104, 397–406. Doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.07.002. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16963014/
Trudgill, P. (1983). Sociolinguistics: An introduction to language and society. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England: Penguin. Doi : 10.4324/9780203130292
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Sonia Belhoum, Benhattab Abdelkader Lotfi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in Journal of Advances in Linguistics are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
