Using Quinclorac to Control Annual Grasses and Palmer Amaranth in Grain Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24297/jaa.v12i.8950Keywords:
yield, Texas millet, postemergence, Palmer amaranth, Broadleaf signalgrassAbstract
Field studies were conducted during the 2015 and 2016 growing seasons in south-central Texas to determine control of Palmer amaranth and annual grasses along with grain sorghum tolerance to quinclorac alone and in various combinations when applied to weeds < 5 cm (EPOST) or 10 to 16 cm tall (LPOST). When evaluated late-season quinclorac alone at 0.43 kg ae ha-1 controlled broadleaf signalgrass 72% when applied EPOST and 91% when applied LPOST. Combinations of quinclorac with either atrazine, pyrasulfotole + bromoxynil, dicamba, or dimethenamid-P controlled Palmer amaranth 88 to 100% when applied EPOST or LPOST; however, broadleaf signalgrass control with these combination was better when applied LPOST (75 to 95%) compared with EPOST (37 to 72%) applications. Texas millet control with quinclorac was poor in both years and was never greater than 54%. Quinclorac plus either atrazine, pyrasulfotole + bromoxynil, dicamba, or atrazine + dimethenamid-P caused at least 20% sorghum injury at one of three locations. No yield reductions from the untreated check were noted in either year; however, in 2016 all treatments with the exception of quinclorac alone at 0.29 kg ha-1 applied EPOST, quinclorac + pyrasulfotole + bromoxynil applied LPOST, quinclorac + atrazine + pyrasulfotole + bromoxynil applied LPOST, and quinclorac + dicamba at either application timing produced yields that were greater than the untreated check.
Downloads
References
Chism, W. J., Bingham, S. W., and Shaver, R. L. (1991). Uptake, translocation, and metabolism of quinclorac in two grass species. Weed Technol. 5:771-775.
Grossman, K. (1998). Quinclorac belongs to a new class of highly selective auxin herbicides. Weed Sci. 46:707-716.
Berghaus, R. and Wuerzer, B, (1987). The mode of action of the new experimental herbicide, quinclorac. (BAS 514H). Proceed. 11th Asian-Pacific Weed Science Society Conference. Pp. 81-87.
Grossman, K. and Kwiatkowski, J. (2000). The mechanism of quinclorac selectivity in grasses. Pesticide Biochem. Physiol. 66:83-91.
Zheng, H. and Hall, J. C. (2001). Understanding auxinic herbicide restitance in wild mustard: physiological, biochemical, and molecular genetic approaches. Weed Sci. 49:276-281.
Zawierucha, J. E. and Penner, D. (2000). Absorption, translocation, metabolism, and spray retention of quinclorac in Digitaria sanguinalis and Eleusine indica. Weed Sci. 48:296-301.
Koo, S. J., Kwon, Y. W., and Cho, K. Y. (1991) Differences in selectivity and physiological effects of quinclorac between rice and barnyardgrass compared with 2,4-D. Proceed. 15th
Asian-Pacific Weed Conf. Pp. 103-111.
Koo, S. J., Neal, J. C., and DiTomaso, J. M. (1996). 3,7-Dichloroquinoline carboxylic acid inhibits cell-wall biosynthesis in maize roots. Plant Physiol. 112:1383-1389.
Koo, S. J., Neal, J. C., and DiTomaso, J. M. (1997). Mechanism of action and selectivity of quinclorac in grass roots. Pesticide Biochem. Physiol. 57:44-53.
Anonymous. (2019). All about sorghum. United Sorghum Checkoff Progam. Available:
www.sorghumcheckoff.com/all-about-sorghum. [6 March, 2020].
Bennett, W. F., Tucker, B. B., and Maunder, A. B. (1990). Modern grain sorghum production. Iowa State Univer. Press. Ames, IA. Pp. 3-27.
Stahlman, P. W. and Wicks, G. A. (2000). Weeds and their control in sorghum. In: Smith, C. W. and Fredrickson, R. A., (ed.). Sorghum Origin History, Technology, and Production. John Wiley & Sons, New York. Pp. 535-590.
Burnside, O. C. and Wicks, G. A. (1990). Influence of weed competition on sorghum growth. Weed Sci. 17:332-334.
Feltner, K. C., Hurst, H. R. and Anderson L. E. (1969a). Yellow foxtail competition in grain sorghum. Weed Sci. 37:211-213.
Feltner, K. C., Hurst, H. R., and Anderson, L. E. (1969b). Tall waterhemp competition in grain sorghum. Weed Sci. 37:214-216.
Graham, P. L., Swiser, J. L., and Wiese, A. F. (1988). Light absorption and competition in raised sorghum-pigweed communities. Agronomy J. 80:415-418.
Knezevic, S. A., Horak, M. J., and Vanderlip, R. L. (1997). Relative time of redroot pigwee(Amaranthus retrofexus L.) emergence is critical in pigweed-sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] mpetition. Weed Sci. 45:502-508.
Zimdahl, R. L. (1998). Fundamentals of weed science. 2nd edition, Academic Press, London, UK. available from: base.dnsgb.com.ua/files/book/Agriculture/Weed/Fundamentals-of- Weed-Science.pdf. [March 6, 2020].
Barber, T., Scott, B., and Norsworthy J. (2004) Weed control in grain sorghum. Arkansas Grain Sorghum Production Handbook, Chapter 8. Available from: https://www.uaex.edu/publications/MP-297.aspx, [March 6, 2020].
Landes, M., Munger, P., Nuyken, W. and Unglaub, W. (1992). New possibilities for targeted weed ontrol in rice with Facet and Facet combinations. Proceed. 1st Internatl. Weed Control Conf. 2:277-279.
Anonymous (2016). Speciman label-Facet L® herbicide. BASF Corp. Research Triangle Park, NC. 15 p.
Frans, R., Talbert, R., Marx, D., and Crowley, H. (1986). Experimental design and techniques for measuring and analyzing plant responses to weed control practices. In: Camper, N. D. (ed). Research Methods in Weed Science. 3rd ed. Champaign, IL: Southern Weed Science Society, Pp. 29-46.
SAS Institute Inc. 2018. SAS/ETS® 15.1 user’s guide. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
Concenco, G., Silva, A. F., Ferreira, E. A., Galon, L., Noldin, J. A., Aspiazu, I., Ferreira, F. A., and Silva, A. A. (2009). Effect of dose and application site on quinclorac absorption by barnyardgrass biotypes. Planta Daninha. 27:541-548. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/SO100-83582009000300015.
Tesch, S. and Grossman, K. (2003). Quinclorac does not inhibit cellulose (cell wall) biosynthesis in sensitive barnyardgrass and maize roots. Pesticide Biochem. Physiol. 75:73-80.
Vincent, W. J. (2015). Evaluating quinclorac for grass weed management in grain sorghum in North Carolina. Masters thesis. North Carolina State Univ. 166p.
Berghaus, R. and Wuerzer. B. (1989). Uptake, translocation and metoblism of quinclorac (BAS 514H) in rice and barnyardgrass. Proceed. 12th Asian-Pacific Weed Sci. Soc. Conf. Pp.133-139.
Dowler, C. C. and Wright, D. L. (1995). Weed management systems for pearl millet in the southeastern United States. First National Grain Pearl Millet Symp. Tifton, GA., Pp. 64-71.
Zawierucha, J. E. and Penner, D. (2001). The relationship of goosegrass (Eleusine indica) stage of growth to quinclorac tolerance. Weed Technol. 15:216-219.
Anderson, W. P. (1996). Weed Science: Principles and Applications,” 3rd edition. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing. Pp. 108-124.
Grossmann, K. and Kwiatkowski, J. (1993). Selective induction of ethylene and cyanide biosynthesis appears to be involved in the selectivity of the herbicide quinclorac between rice and barnyardgrass. J. of Plant Physiol. 142:457-466.
Grossmann, K. and Scheltrup, F. (1997). Selective induction of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) synthase activity is involved in the selectivity of the auxin herbicide quinclorac between barnyardgrass and rice. Pest. Biochem. Physiol. 58:145-153.
Hayashi, T. and Maclachlan, G. (1984). Pea xyloglucan and cellulose. III. Metabolism during lateral expansion of pea epicotyl cells. Plant Physiol. 76:739-742.
Finlayson, S. A., Liu, J-H, and Reed, D. M. (1996). Localization of ethylene biosynthesis in roots of sunflower (Helianthus annuus) seedlings. Plant Physiol. 96:36-42.
Pazmino, D. M., Romero-Puertas, M., and Sandalio, L. M. (2012). Insights into the toxicity mechanism of and cell response to the herbicide 2,4-D in plants. Plant Signal. Behav. 7:425-427.
Ramakrishna, A., Ong, C. K., and S. L. N. Reddy. (1991). Studies on integrated weed management in sorghum. Trop. Pest Manage. 37:159-161.
Phillips, W. M. (1960). Controlling weeds in sorghum. Report of Kansas Agric. Expt. Stat. Kansas State Univ. Manhattan, KS. Circular 360. 12 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 James Grichar, Travis Janak
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in Journal of Advances in Linguistics are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.