Effect of Surfactant Compound Sprays on The Rate of Adsorption on Different Target Surfaces


  • Muhammed Cemal Toraman Hakkâri University
  • Ali Bayat Çukurova University




Clinging to, Contact Diameter, Drop Heights, leaves


The first operation of adsorption on leaf surfaces in pulverization is drop sticking. In the water wettability of the surfaces, the sticking of the drops has a great importance. Drop contact angle, contact height, and contact diameter values in the third and tenth seconds were measured with Drop Shape Analysis 10 device to determine adsorption, spreading, and sticking levels by applying mixtures of ten surface active substances including different contents with pure water to different leaf surfaces. The adsorption and sticking rates of the drops they formed on different leaf surfaces were determined for the time they are obtained from the data obtained in both time periods. Furthermore, the spreading rates of the mixtures prepared by taking into account the change rates during the last seven seconds between these two periods were determined as the sticking rate. Coating shares related to covering rates of different surface active substances with different surface properties on the surface of leaves were evaluated as possible work success according to the adsorption, spreading and sticking levels anticipated in spraying. According to their results on the application surfaces, surface active substances and leaves were evaluated statistically by the SPSS 15 program in terms of their similar properties. It has been found that surface active substance mixtures with sodium carboxymethylcellulose and carboxymethylcellulose contents had the largest drop contact angles and contact heights with the smallest drop contact diameters on the leaf surfaces, and a negative impact on the adsorption performance as they spread very little over seven seconds. It has been determined that drops with surface active substance including trisiloxane + allyloxypolyethyleneglycol and alcoholethoxylate, alkylphenolethoxylate have formed the smallest contact angles, minimum drop heights and largest contact diameters on the surface of the leaves, as well as increased adsorption and sticking by spreading rapidly for seven seconds.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Muhammed Cemal Toraman, Hakkâri University

Hakkâri University, Çölemerik Vocational School, Hakkâri, Turkey

Ali Bayat, Çukurova University

Çukurova University Department of Agricultural Machinery and Technology Engineering, Adana, Turkey


Kirkaç Ç., (2005): Evaluation of Pestisit Droplet Distribution by Image Analysis, Ankara University. Master Thesis. Ankara.

Çilingir ?., Dursun E. (2010): Plant Protection Machines. A.Ü. Agriculture Departmants. Publication No: 1531, Course Books Publication Number: 484 Ankara.

Fowkes F.M. (1964): Attractive Forces at Interfaces. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 56 (12): 40-52.

Moy E., Neumann A.W. (1987): Solid/Liquid Interfacial Tensions from contact Angle Data and Direct Force Measurements. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 119 (1): 296-297.

Owens D.K., Wendt R.C. (1969): Estimation of the Surface Free Energy of Polymers. In: Journal of Applied Polymer Science 13(8): 1741-1747.

Zisman W.A. (1964): Relation of Equilibrium Contact Angle to Liquid and Solid Constitutions in Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion. Advances in Chemistry Series. American Chemical Society: Washington D.C., Vol.43, 1-51.

Gaskin R.E., Steele K.D., Forster W.A. (2005): Plant Protection Chemistry. New Zealand.

Hock W.K. (1998): Horticultural Spray Adjuvants. The Pennsylvania State University, 112 Agricultural Administration Building, U.S. University Park, PA 16802.

Tu M., Randall J.M. (2001): Adjuvants, 8.1-8.24. In Weed Control Methods Handbook: Tools and Techniques for Use in Natural Areas (Eds: M. Tu, C. Hurd & J. M. Randall). The Nature Conservancy, The Global Invasive Species Team.

Holloway P.J., Silcox D. (1985): Behaviour of Three Nonionic Surfactants Following Foliar Application. 1985 British Crop Protection Conference-Weeds. BCPC Publications, Croydon, UK.

Zabkiewicz J.A., Gaskin R.E., Balneaves J.M. (1985): Effect of additives on foliar wetting and uptake of glyphosate into gorse (Ulex europaeus). 1985 BCPC Monogram No. 28 Symposium on Application and Biology.

Holloway P.J., Wong W.W.C., Partridge H.J. (1992): Effects of some nonionic polyoxyethylene surfactants on uptake of ethirimol and diclobutrazol from suspension formulations applied to wheat leaves. Pesticide Science, 34, 109–118.

Uhlig B.A., Wissemeier A.H. (2000): Reduction of nonionic surfactant phytotoxicity by divalent cations. Crop Protection, 19, 13–19.

Brazee R.D., Bukovac M.J., Zhu H. (2004): Diffusion model for plant cuticular penetration by a spray applied weak organic acid bioregulator in presence or absence of ammonium nitrate. Transactions of the ASAE, 47(3), 629–635.

Ellis M.C.B., Tuck C.R., Miller P.C.H. (2001): How surface tension of surfactant solutions influences the characteristics of sprays produced by hydraulic nozzles used for pesticide application. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 180, 267–276.

Ramsdale B.K., Messersmith C.G. (2001): Nozzle, spray volume, and adjuvants effects on carfentrazone and imazamox efficacy. Weed Technology, 15, 485–491.

Stainier C., Destain M.F., Schiffers B., Lebeau F. (2006): Droplet size spectra and drift effect of two phenmedipham formulations and four adjuvants mixtures. Crop Protection, 25, 1238–1243.

Spanoghe P., Schampheleire M.D., Meeren P.V.D., Steurbaut W. (2007): Influence of agricultural adjuvants on droplet spectra. Pest Management Science, 63, 4–16.

Stevens P.J.G., Walker J.T.S., Shaw P.W., Suckling D.M. (1994): Organosilicone surfactants: tools for horticultural crop protection. Proc. Brighton Crop Prot. 755-760.

Zabkiewicz J.A., Coupland D., Ede F. (1988): Effects of surfactants on droplet spreading and drying rates in relation to foliar uptake. Pesticide Formulations 77-89.

Nalewaja J.D., Matysiak R. (2000): Spray deposits from nicosulfuron with salts that affect efficacy. Weed Technology 14: 740-749.

Basu S., Luthra J., Nigam K.D.P. (2002): The effects of surfactants on adhesion, spreading and retention of herbicide droplet on the surface of the leaves and seeds. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, B37(4), 331– 344.

Gaskin R.E., Murray R.J., Krishna H., Carpenter A. (2000): Effect of adjuvants on the retention of insecticide spray on cucumber and pea foliage. New Zealand Plant Protection. 53, 355-359

Camacho F.G., Grima E.M., Miron A. S., Pascual V.G., Chisti Y. (2001): Carboxymethyl cellulose protects algal cells against hydrodynamic stress. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Almer?´a, E-04071 Almer?´a, Spain. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 29. 602–610.

Hoffman B.J. (2004): Analysis of Alcohol and Alkylphenol Polyethers via Packed Column Supercritical Fluid Chromatography. Doctor of Philosophy in Chemistry. Blacksburg, Virginia.

Kural F.H., Gürsoy R.N. (2011): Biosurfactants. Journal of Hacettepe University Faculty of Pharmacy. Volume 31, Issue 1, pp. 71-82.

Biscay F., Ghoufi A., Malfryt P. (2011): Surface tension of water–alcohol mixtures from Monte Carlo simulations. The Journal of Chem?cal Physics 134, 044709.

Cytec (2013): Specialty Additives Aerosol Surfactants. Aerosol Surfactants Brochure.

Temelda? M. (2007): Evaluation of Spreader-Adhesives Participating in Agricultural pesticides in terms of Spraying Technique. Cukurova University. Adana.




How to Cite

Toraman, M. C., & Bayat, A. (2019). Effect of Surfactant Compound Sprays on The Rate of Adsorption on Different Target Surfaces. JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN AGRICULTURE, 10, 1834–1845. https://doi.org/10.24297/jaa.v10i0.8442