A Monster-Symmetric Admissibility Formulation of the SEXA Unified Field Theory: Operator-Glyph Closure, Σ₆₀ Exciternion Logic, and Falsifiable Reduction to General Relativity, Quantum Field Theory, and Yukawa Interaction Regimes

Jered  McClain

doi:10.24297/jam.v25i.9887

Authors

Jered McClain

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24297/jam.v25i.9887

Keywords:

SEXA Unified Field Theory, Exciternion, Glyph Admissibility, Monster Group, Baby Monster Group, Recursive Closure, Σ60 Logic System, High-Dimensional Systems, Unified Field Theory, Mathematical Physics

Abstract

This paper reformulates the SEXA Unified Field Theory within a glyph-governed symmetry framework in which admissible physical states are determined not solely by recursive energy closure, but by invariant compatibility across the SEXA glyph system and high-order finite symmetry structure. Rather than replacing the existing SEXA equation, the present work extends it by introducing a Monster-symmetry-constrained admissibility layer acting on the five-dimensional SEXA exciter manifold and its recursive extensions through the SEXA dimensional stack.

The framework is organized through six primary glyph operators: Orr, Na, Ka, Sa, Mu, and Wa, corresponding respectively to radiant energy, flow dynamics, manifold logic, symmetry and stress, mass and memory, and conscious observation. These glyphs function as admissibility gates through which recursive field configurations must pass in order to remain physically meaningful under dimensional embedding, thinning, and collapse. Monster and Baby Monster symmetry are introduced as invariant classifiers of the glyph-admitted exciternion state space, restricting stable configurations to discrete orbit classes.

Within this formulation, the SEXA unified energy equation is preserved as the physical anchor of the theory, while the glyph layer specifies the logical and structural conditions under which its terms may be admitted. Interdimensional payload interception is formalized as a glyph-filtered and symmetry-constrained compression of higher-dimensional energy contributions into boundary-accessible field structure. The Σ₆₀ system is introduced as a finite admissibility algebra governing recursive evaluation across the exciternion state space.

The framework is explicitly falsifiable. Failure of glyph closure, invariant symmetry compatibility, General Relativity reduction, Quantum Field Theory reduction, or Yukawa-type short-range behavior constitutes immediate rejection.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arkani-Hamed, N., Huang, Y., & O’Connell, D. (2017). Scattering amplitudes and the positive Grassmannian. Journal of High Energy Physics.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2017)068

Baez, J. C., & Huerta, J. (2018). The algebra of grand unified theories. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 47(3), 483–552.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0273-0979-10-01280-8

Carroll, S. M. (2019). Spacetime and geometry: An introduction to general relativity. Cambridge University Press.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108770385

Conway, J. H., & Norton, S. P. (1979). Monstrous moonshine. Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, 11(3), 308–339.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1112/blms/11.3.308

Einstein, A. (1916). The foundation of the general theory of relativity. Annalen der Physik, 49, 769–822.

Flom, A. (2025). Sigmatics: A 96-class geometric algebra computational framework for high-dimensional recursive structures. (Computational correspondence and structural validation framework). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17791722

Griess, R. L. (1982). The friendly giant (The Monster group). Inventiones Mathematicae, 69(1), 1–102.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01389347

McClain, J. (2025). A recursive closure criterion for a theory of everything: A 60-glyph quaternionic inter-domain syllogistic admissibility standard (Prime Atom of Logic). Zenodo.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18228214

McClain, J. (2025). The SEXA mathematical framework — Unified recursive manifold dynamics, dimensional collapse operators, and triality-structured exciter geometry — Master peer-review edition. Zenodo.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17791722

McClain, J. (2025). The SEXA recursive energy functional (SREF): Spectral gain-60 recursion on a 5D manifold and bounded dynamical stability. Zenodo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19387116

Peskin, M. E., & Schroeder, D. V. (1995). An introduction to quantum field theory. Addison-Wesley.

Polchinski, J. (2017). Effective field theory and the Fermi surface.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1708.09079

Schwartz, M. D. (2020). Quantum field theory and the standard model (Updated ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Witten, E. (2018). Symmetry and emergence. Nature Physics, 14, 116–119.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys4264

Yukawa, H. (1935). On the interaction of elementary particles. Proceedings of the Physico-Mathematical Society of Japan, 17, 48–57.

McClain, J. (2026). Formal compatibility and falsifiability assessment of the SEXA unified field model. Zenodo. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19287354

Hossenfelder, S. (2018). Lost in math: How beauty leads physics astray. Basic Books. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1803.07038

Rovelli, C. (2021). Helgoland: Making sense of the quantum revolution. Riverhead Books.