The Quality Lecture: How Do We Rate?

Authors

  • Tzong-Yang Pan ANU College of Medicine, Biology & Environment, Australian National Univerisity, Canberra, ACT Australia
  • Cathy Owen Rural Clinical School ANU Medical School, ANU College of Medicine, Australian National Univerisity, Canberra, ACT Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24297/ijrem.v5i3.3896

Keywords:

Lectures, lecture quality, higher education, graduate medical education, effective learning.

Abstract

Aims: to review the key features of an effective lecture and to rate a series of medical school lectures to inform a broader initiative in staff development in effective lecturing

Background: Lectures are the primary method of delivering information to an audience in tertiary education and remain a key part of medical school education

Method: Literature review confirmed fourteen elements thought to contribute to the quality of a lecture. A lecture series was then rated using these criteria

Results: The three highest rated criteria were explaining and summarising key concepts, presenting material at an appropriate level to the audience, and the use of clear audio-visual aids and voice. The three lowest rated aspects of our lecture program were stating goals of the talk, monitoring audience understanding and responding appropriately, and providing a conclusion to the talk.

Conclusions: These findings will provide direction to staff development to further improve the quality of lectures provided to students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Cathy Owen, Rural Clinical School ANU Medical School, ANU College of Medicine, Australian National Univerisity, Canberra, ACT Australia

Biology and Environment,

Downloads

Published

2014-05-08

How to Cite

Pan, T.-Y., & Owen, C. (2014). The Quality Lecture: How Do We Rate?. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATION METHODOLOGY, 5(3), 710–720. https://doi.org/10.24297/ijrem.v5i3.3896

Issue

Section

Articles