Interaction effect of rootstocks on gas exchange parameters, biochemical changes and nutrientstatus in Sauvignon Blanc winegrapes

Authors

  • R. G. Somkuwar National Research Centre for Grapes, Manjri Farm, Pune- 412 307 (India)
  • M. A. Bhange National Research Centre for Grapes, Manjri Farm, Pune-412 307 (India)
  • A. K. Upadhyay National Research Centre for Grapes, Manjri Farm, Pune-412 307 (India)
  • S. D. Ramteke National Research Centre for Grapes, Manjri Farm, Pune-412 307 (India)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24297/jaa.v3i3.6566

Abstract

SauvignonBlanc wine grape was characterized for their various morphological, physiological and biochemical parameters grafted on different rootstocks. Significant differences were recorded for all the parameters studied. The studies on vegetative parameters revealed that the rootstock influences the vegetative growth thereby increasing the photosynthetic activities of a vine. The highest photosynthesis rate was recorded in 140-Ru grafted vine followed by Fercal whereas the lowest in Salt Creek rootstock grafted vines.The rootstock influenced the changes in biochemical constituents in the grafted vine thereby helping the plant to store enough food material. Significant differences were recorded for total carbohydrates, proteins, total phenols and reducing sugar. The vines grafted on1103-Pshowed highest carbohydrates and starch followed by 140-Ru,while the least amount of carbohydrates were recorded in 110-R and Salt Creek grafted vines respectively.Among the different rootstock graft combinations, Fercal showed highest amount of reducing sugar, proteins and phenols, followed by 1103-P and SO4, however, the lowest amount of reducing sugar, proteins and phenols were recorded with 110-R grafted vines.The vines grafted on different rootstocks showed changes in nutrient uptake. Considering this, the physico-biochemical characterization of grafted vine may help to identify particularrootstocks combination that could influence a desired trait in commercial wine grape varieties after grafting.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bavaresco, L., Giachino, E., Pezzutto, S. 2003. Grapevine rootstock effects on lime-induced chlorosis, nutrient uptake, and source–sink relationships. J Plant Nutrition. 26: 1451– 1465.

Bica, D., Gay, G., Morando, A., Soave, E., Bravdo, B. A. 2000. Effect of rootstock and Vitisviniferagenotype on photosynthetic parameters. ActaHort. 526: 373-379.

Candolfi-Vasconcelos, M. C., Koblet, W. 1991. Influence of partial defoliation on gas exchange parameters and chlorophyll content of field-grown grapevines mechanisms and limitations of the compensationcapacity. Vitis. 30:129-141.

Candolfi-Vasconcelos, M. C., Kummer, M., Keller, M., Basler, P., and Koblet, W. 1997. Nitrogen response of VitisviniferaMuller-Thurgau grafted on 6 different rootstocks: canopy characteristics and leaf gas exchange. Proceedings of the 4thIntSymp on Cool Climate Vitic and Enol, Rochester, New York, USA. III: 32-36.

Cortell, J. M., Halbleib, M., Gallagher, A. V., Righetti, T. L., Kennedy, J. A. 2005. Influence of vine vigour on grape(VitisviniferaL. cv. Pinot Noir) and wine proanthocyanidins. J Agric Food Chem.53:5798-5808.

Downton, W. J. S.1977. Chloride accumulation in different species of grapevine.SciHort. 7: 249–253.

During, H. 1994. Photosynthesis of ungrafted and grafted grapevines: effects of rootstock genotype and plant age.Amer J EnolViticult. 45:297-299.

Fardossi, A., Brandes, W., and Mayer, C. 1995. Influence of different rootstock cultivars on growth, leaf nutrient content and must quality of cultivar GrunerVeltliner. MitteilungenKlosterneuburg, Rebe und Wein.Obstbau and Fruchteverwertung. 45: 3-15.

Fisarakis, J., Nikolao, N., Tsikalas, P., Therios, I., Stavrakas, D. 2004. Effect of salinity and rootstock on concentration of potassium, calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, and nitrate-nitrogen in Thompson Seedless grapevine. J. Plant Nutr. 27:2117-2134

Garcia, M. P.,GallegoC. D., Ibrahim, H. 2001. Effect of three rootstocks on grapevine (VitisviniferaL) cv. Negrette, grown hydroponically. I. Potassium, calcium and magnesium nutrition. S AfrJEnolVitic. 22:101-103.

Grant, R. S., Matthews, M. A.1996. The influence of phosphorus availability, scion and rootstock on grapevine shoot growth, leaf area and petiole phosphorus concentration. Am J EnolVitic. 47:217- 224.

Ibacache, A. G., Sierra, C. B. 2009. Influence of rootstocks on nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content in petioles of four Table grape varieties. Chilean Journal of Agric. 69: 503-508.

Indian Horticulture Database2013.National Horticulture Board, Gurgaon, India. 68(4):75.

Jackson, R. S. 2000. Wine science: principles, practice, perception. 2nd ed. San Diego (etc.), Academic Press. pp.648.

Keller, M., Kummer, M., Vasconcelos, M. C. 2001. Soil nitrogen utilization for growth and gas exchange by grapevines in response tonitrogen supply and rootstock. Aust J Grape Wine Res. 7:2-11.

Lamb, D. W., Weedon, M. M., Bramley, R. G. V. 2004. Using remote sensing to predict grape phenolics and color at harvest in a Cabernet Sauvignon vineyard: Timing observations against vine physiology and optimizing image resolution. Aust J Grape Wine Res.10:46-54.

Mabrouk, H., Sinoquet, H. 1998. Indices of light microclimate and canopy structure of grapevines determined by 3D digitizing and image analysis. Aust J Grape Wine Res. 4:2-13.

May, P. 1994. Using grapevine rootstocks: the Australian perspective. (Wine titles: Adelaide)

Mc Carthy, M. G., Cirami, R. M.,Furkaliev, D. G. 1997. Rootstock response of Shiraz (Vitisvinifera L) grapevines to dry and drip-irrigated conditions. Aus J Grape and Wine Res. 3(2): 95-98.

Mpelasoka, B. S., Schachtman, D. P., Treely, M. T.,Thomas, M. R.2003. A review of potassium nutrition in grapevines with special emphasis on berry accumulation. Aus J Grape and Wine Res. 9:154-168.

Padgett-Johnson, M., Williams, L. E., Walker, M. A.2000. The influence of Vitisriparia rootstock on water relations and gas exchange of Vitisvinifera cv. Carignane scion under non-irrigated conditions. Amer JEnolVitic. 51(2):137- 143.

Rafaat, S. S., Gendy, E. l. 2013. Evaluation of Flame Seedless Grapevines Grafted on Some Rootstocks. J of HortSci and Ornamental Plants. 5 (1): 01-11.

Renata, V. M., Claudia, R. S., Camila, P. C. S., Gustavo, D. F. F., Tania, M. S., Eduardo, P., Franco, M. L., Murillo, D. A. R. 2010. Biochemical and agronomical responsesof grapevines to alteration of source-sink ratioby cluster thinning and shoot trimming. Bragantia Camp 69 (1): 17-25.

Reynolds, A. G., Wardle, D. A., 2001. Rootstocks impact vine performance and fruit composition of grapes in British Columbia. Hort Technol. 11:419-427.

Robinson, J. B., 2005. Critical plant tissue values and application of nutritional standards for practical use in vineyards. Pp 61-68. In Christensen, L.P., and D.R. Smart (eds.) Proceedings of the Soil Environment and Vine Mineral Nutrition Symposium. The AmerSoc for EnolandVitic, Davis, California, USA.

Ruhl, E. H., Clingeleffer, P. R., Nicholas, P. R., Cirami, R. M., McCarthy, M. G.,Whitin, J. R.1988. Effect of rootstocks on berry weight and pH, mineral content and organic acid concentrations of grape juice of some wine varieties. Austral J Exp Ag 28:119-125.

Sadashivam, S., Manickam, A. 1996. Biochemical Methods for Agricultural Sciences, New Delhi, pp. 251.

SAS, 9.3 T S Level 1 M0. Copyright© (2002-2010) by SAS Institute Inc., Cary. NC, USA. Licensed to Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute. Site11601386.

Singleton, V. L., Rossi, J. A. 1965. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphor molybdic –phospho tungstic acid reagents. AmerJEnolVitic 16:144-158.

Somkuwar, R. G., Satisha, J., Ramteke, S. D.2006. Effect of different rootstocks on fruitfulness in Thompson Seedless grapes (VitisviniferaL.). J of Plant Sci. 1(2):176:181.

Somkuwar, R. G., Satisha, J., Ramteke, S. D., Sharma, J. 2009. Root Distribution, Partitioning of Dry Matter and Nutrient Uptake in Thompson Seedless Grapes (Vitisvinifera L.) Grafted on Different Rootstocks. Indian J AgrilSci. 79(9): 669- 673.

Somkuwar, R. G., Satisha, J., Ramteke, S.D. 2013. Berry weight, quality and biochemical changes in relation to cane thickness of own rooted and grafted Tas-A-Ganesh grapes. J. of Hort. Sci. 8(1):30-34.

Striegler, R. K., Howell, G. S., Flore, J. A. 1993. Influence of rootstock on the response of Seyval grapevines to flooding stress.AmJ of Enol and Vitic 44:313–319.

Troncoso, A., Atti, C. M., Cantos, M. 1999. Evaluation of salt tolerance of in- vitro grown grapevine rootstock varieties. Vitis 38(2):55-60.

Urban, L., Mathieu, L., LU, P. 2004. Effect of fruit load and girdling on leaf photosynthesis in Mangiferaindica L. J of Exp Bot. 55: 2075-2085.

Walker, R. R., Blackmore, D. H., Clingeleffer, P. R. and Correll, R. L. 2002. Rootstock effects on salt tolerance of irrigated field-grown grapevines (VitisviniferaL. cv. Sultana). 1. Yield and vigour interrelationships. Aust J Grape and Wine Res 8: 3 -14.

Walker, R. R., Blackmore, D. H., Clingeleffer, P. R. andCorrell, R. L.2004. Rootstock effects on salt tolerance of irrigated field-grown grapevines (VitisviniferaL. cv. Sultana) 2. Ion concentrations in leaves and juice.Aust J Grape and Wine Res. 10: 90 -99.

Wong, S. C., Cowan, I. R., Farquhar, G. D. 1985. Leaf conductance in relation to rate of CO2 assimilation: I. Influence of nitrogen nutrition, phosphorus nutrition, photon flux density and ambirnt partial pressure of CO2 during ontogent. Plant physiol. 78: 821-825.

JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN AGRICULTURE

Downloads

Published

2014-12-26

How to Cite

Somkuwar, R. G., Bhange, M. A., Upadhyay, A. K., & Ramteke, S. D. (2014). Interaction effect of rootstocks on gas exchange parameters, biochemical changes and nutrientstatus in Sauvignon Blanc winegrapes. JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN AGRICULTURE, 3(3), 218–225. https://doi.org/10.24297/jaa.v3i3.6566

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 3 (2015)

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License All articles published in Journal of Advances in Linguistics are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.