Qualitative Case Study on Virtual Simulations Engaging Educational Leadership Candidates in Ethical Scenarios that Positively Impacted Leadership Skills

Dr. Aneta  Walker; Dr. Julie Gray; Dr. Karen  Evans

doi:10.24297/ijrem.v15i.9610

Authors

Dr. Aneta Walker University of West Florida
Dr. Julie Gray
Dr. Karen Evans The University of West Florida

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24297/ijrem.v15i.9610

Keywords:

ethical decision-making, ethics, leadership coaching, high-impact practices, experiential learning

Abstract

In this paper, the authors describe one leadership preparation program's approach to enhancing ethics and ethical decision-making by embedding high-impact practices and experiential learning opportunities for leadership candidates. The conceptual framework for this research was based on Kolb's Experiential Learning Theory (ELT) and Kuh's High-Impact Practices (HIPs) to connect theory and practice through practical feedback and leadership coaching. Using experiential virtual simulation experiences provided opportunities for Educational Leadership candidates to apply instructional and ethical leadership practices to authentic, problem-based situations in an innovative online educational leadership program. This approach allowed faculty to offer specific growth areas to strengthen and improve aspiring school leaders' ethical decision-making practices. Furthermore, the paper discusses how virtual simulation enhanced candidates' transformation learning process and bridge theory to practice in a virtual reality environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akella, D. (2010). Learning together: Kolb’s experiential theory and its application. Journal of Management & Organization,16(1), 100–112. https://doi.org/10.5172/jmo.16.1.100

Arthur, J. and Kristjánsson, K. (2023). The Jubilee Center framework for character education in schools. University of Birmingham, Jubilee Centre for Character and Virtues. https://www.jubileecentre.ac.uk/527/character-education/framework

Association of American Colleges and Universities (2002). Greater expectations: A new vision for learning in the 21st century. https://www.aacu.org/sites/default/files/files/publications/GreaterExpectations.pdf

Association of American Colleges and Universities (2017a). High-impact educational practices. https://www.aacu.org/leap/hips

Association of American Colleges and Universities (2017b), Registrant list for institute on high-impact practices and student success. http://secure.aacu.org/iMIS/AACU/Meetings/INSTHPRegList.aspx

Association of American Colleges and Universities (2017c). Team cluster assignments and goals. http://www.aacu.org/sites/default/files/files/Team%20Clusters%20and%20Goals%20for 20Binder.pdf

Association of American Colleges and Universities (2017d). 2017 HIPs Institute - Goals summary. https://www.aacu.org/summerinstitutes/hips/2017/participants

Bernstein, E., McMenamin, S. A., & Johanek, M. C. (2016). Authentic online branching simulations: Promoting discourse around problems of practice. In P. Dickenson, & J. J. Jaurez (Eds.), Student Engagement and Participation (pp. 1197–1216). IGI Global.

Brown-Ferrigno, T. (2007). Developing school leaders: Practitioner growth during an advanced leadership development program for principals and administrator-trained teachers. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 2(3), 1-30. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ958856.pdf

Brownell, J. E., & Swaner, L. E. (2010). Five high-impact practices: Researcher on learning outcomes, completion, and quality. Association of American Colleges and Universities. https://www.aacu.org/publication/five-high-impact-practices-research-on-learning-outcomes-completion-and-quality

Christensen, C. M., Horn, M. B., Caldera, L., & Soares, L. (2011, February). Disrupting college: How disruptive innovation can deliver quality and affordability to postsecondary education. http://www.innosightinstitute.org/innosight/wpcontent/uploads/2011/02/future_of_higher_ed-2.3.pdf

Cunningham, W. (2007). A handbook for educational leadership interns: A rite of passage. Allyn and Bacon.

Cunningham, W. G., & Sherman, W. H. (2008). Effective internships: Building bridges between theory and practice. The Educational Forum, 72(4), 308–318.

Daresh, J. C. (2004). Mentoring school leaders: Professional promise or predictable problems? Educational Administration Quarterly, 40, 495–517. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X04267114

Darling-Hammond, L., LaPointe, M., Meyerson, D., Orr, M. T., & Cohen, C. (2007). Preparing school leaders for a changing world: Lessons from exemplary leadership development program. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Stanford Educational Leadership Institute. https://wallacefoundation.org/sites/default/files/2023-09/Preparing-School-Leaders-Executive-Summary.pdf

Davis, S. H., Leon, R. J., & Fultz, M. (2013). How Principals Learn to Lead: The Comparative Influence of On-the-Job Experiences, Administrator Credential Programs, and the ISLLC Standards in the Development of Leadership Expertise among Urban Public School Principals. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 8(1), 1–33. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1012996.pdf

Decker, S., Fey, M., Sideras, S., Caballero, S., Boese, T., Franklin, A. E., ... & Borum, J. C. (2013). Standards of best practice: Simulation standard VI: The debriefing process. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 9(6), S26-S29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2013.04.008

Derr, C. L. (2012). Ethics and leadership. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 9(6), 66–71.

Dexter, S., Clement, D., Moraguez, D., & Watson, G. S. (2020). (Inter)Active learning tools and pedagogical strategies in educational leadership preparation. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 15(3), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775120936299

Dieker, L., Hynes, M., Stapleton, C., & Hughes, C. (2007). Virtual classrooms: STAR simulator building virtual environments for teacher training in effective classroom management. New Learning Technology SALT, pp. 4, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142941142

Dieker, L.A., Rodriguez, J., Lignugaris-Kraft, B., Hynes, M., & Hughes, C.E. (2014). The future of simulated environments in teacher education: Current potential and future possibilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 37(1), 21–33.

Dodson, R. L. (2015). What makes them the best? An analysis of the relationship between state education quality and principal preparation practices. International Journal of Education Policy & Leadership, 10(7). http://journals.sfu.ca/ijepl/index.php/ijepl/article/view/634/152

Dodson, R. L. (2014, June). Which field experiences best prepare future school leaders? An analysis of Kentucky’s principal preparation program. Educational Research Quarterly, 37(4), 41–56. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1061927.pdf

Donaldson, J. (2009). Fostering transformative learning in leadership development. In J. Mezirow & E. Taylor (Eds.) Transformative learning in practice (pp. 67–77). Jossey Bass.

Dunlap, J. C. (2005). Problem-based learning and self-efficacy: How a capstone course prepares students for a profession. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 65-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504858

Dunlap, J., Li, J., & Kladifko, R. (2015). Competencies for Effective School Leadership: To What Extent Are They Included in Ed. D. Leadership Programs? Educational Leadership and Administration: Teaching and Program Development, 26, 14-26. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1062258.pdf

Fullan, M. (2002). Principals as leaders in a culture of change. Educational Leadership, 59(8), 16–21.

Gaba, D. M., Howard, S. K., Fish, K. J., Smith, B. E., & Sowb, Y. A. (2001). Simulation-based training in anesthesia crisis resource management (ACRM): a decade of experience. Simulation & Gaming, 32(2), 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/104687810103200206

Gardner, R. (2013). Introduction to debriefing. Seminars in perinatology, 37(3), 166–74.

Gilbert, K. A., Voelkel, R. H., & Johnson, C. W. (2018). Increasing self-efficacy through immersive simulations: Leading professional learning communities. Journal of Leadership Education,17(3). https://journalofleadershiped.org/jole_articles/increasing-self-efficacy-through-immersive-simulations-leading-professional-learning-communities/

Grissom, J. A., Egalite, A. J., & Lindsay, C. A. (2021). How principals affect students and schools. Wallace Foundation, 2(1), 30–41. https://wallacefoundation.org/sites/default/files/2023-09/How-Principals-Affect-Students-and-Schools.pdf

Grossman, R. (2009). Structures for facilitating student reflection. College teaching, 57(1), 15–22. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25763356

Hallinger, P., & Bridges, E. M. (2017). A systematic review of research on the use of problem-based learning in the preparation and development of school leaders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(2), 255–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X16659347

Hay, D., McCourt Larres, P., Oyelere, P., & Fisher, A. (2001). The ethical perception of undergraduate students in computer-related situations: An analysis of the effects of culture, gender and prior education. Teaching Business Ethics, 5(3), 331–356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1011445614132

Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (1999). Encouraging the heart: A leader's guide to rewarding and recognizing others. John Wiley & Sons.

Lowrey, S. (2014). A mixed-methods study of principal efficacy and transformational leadership in Canada. International Studies in Educational Administration (Commonwealth Council for Educational Administration & Management), 42(3).

Feng, Q., Luo, H., Li, W., Chen, Y., & Zhang, J. (2021). The moderating effect of debriefing on learning outcomes of IVR-based instruction: An experimental research. Applied sciences, 11(21), 10426. https://www.mdpi.com/1346550

Lynch, J. M. (2012). Responsibilities of today's principal: Implications for principal preparation programs and principal certification policies. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 31(2), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687051203100205

McGaghie, W. C., & Issenberg, S. B. (1999). Simulations in professional competence assessment: basic considerations. In Innovative simulations for assessing professional competence (pp. 7-22). University of Illinois College of Medicine, Department of Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.9.861

McGaghie, W. C. (1999). Simulation in professional competence assessment: Basic considerations. In A. Tekian, C. H. McGuire, & W. C. McGaghie (Eds.), Innovative simulations for assessing professional competence: From paper-and-pencil to virtual reality (pp. 7–22). Chicago, IL: Department of Medical Education, University of Illinois at Chicago.

Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778

Ruiz, P., Ruiz, C., & Martinez, R. (2011). Improving the “leader-follower” relationship: Top manager or supervisor? The ethical leadership trickle-down effect on follower job response. Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 587-608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0670-3

Sabei, S. D. A., & Lasater, K. (2016). Simulation debriefing for clinical judgment development: A concept analysis. Nurse Education Today, 45, 42-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.06.008

Sandars, J. (2009). The use of reflection in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 44. Medical teacher, 31(8), 685–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590903050374

Sergiovanni, T. J. (1992). Moral Leadership: Getting to the Heart of School Improvement. Jossey-Bass.

Shapiro, J. P., & Stefkovich, J. A. (2016). Ethical Leadership and Decision Making in Education: Applying Theoretical Perspectives to Complex Dilemmas. Routledge.

Tannenbaum, S. I., & Cerasoli, C. P. (2013). Do team and individual debriefs enhance performance? A meta-analysis. Human factors, 55(1), 231-245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720812448394