Joint Independent Component Analysis for Enhanced Preprocessing in Collaborative Multi-Brain Motor Imagery BCIs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24297/ijct.v25i.9793Keywords:
inter-brain synchrony, EEG preprocessing, joint independent component analysis, motor imagery, collaborative brain–computer interface (cBCI)Abstract
Collaborative brain–computer interfaces (cBCIs) extend single-user BCIs to multi-brain recordings, enabling the investigation of inter-brain synchrony and cooperative neural processing. Motor imagery (MI) paradigms are of particular interest but face challenges such as low signal-to-noise ratio, inter-subject variability, and artifact contamination in electroencephalography (EEG) data. Independent component analysis (ICA), though widely applied in single-user MI-BCIs, is suboptimal in cBCIs since it is performed separately for each participant, thereby overlooking shared neural dynamics and potentially distorting inter-brain coupling. To address these limitations, this work proposes a joint ICA-based preprocessing framework that jointly decomposes EEG data from paired participants to enhance artifact suppression while preserving cross-brain synchrony. The performance of joint ICA is evaluated against subject-wise ICA from two perspectives: (i) motor imagery decoding accuracy, examined using spatial filtering with subsequent linear discriminant classification and a convolutional neural network architecture, and (ii) inter-brain synchrony quantified by the phase locking value (PLV) across homologous electrode pairs. Experimental results show that joint ICA improves decoding accuracy by 4.8% and 3.67% in the respective pipelines, while also yielding significantly stronger inter-brain PLV. These findings demonstrate that joint ICA offers an effective preprocessing strategy to improve both neural fidelity and classification robustness in MI-driven cBCI systems.
Downloads
References
Cheng, S., & Wang, J. (2024). Mi 2 mi: Training dyad with collaborative brain-computer interface and cooperative motor imagery tasks for better BCI performance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.00470. https://doi.org/10.48550/ arXiv.2406.00470
Czeszumski, A., Eustergerling, S., Lang, A., Menrath, D., Gerstenberger, M., Schuberth, S., Schreiber, F., Rendon, Z., Grünewald, S., Hahn, L., et al. (2020). Hyperscanning: A valid method to study neural inter-brain underpinnings of social interaction. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 14, 39. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00039 Gao, X., Gui, K., Wu, X., Metcalfe, B., & Zhang, D. (2025). Effects of different preprocessing pipelines on motor imagerybased brain-computer interfaces [Epub 2025 May 6]. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 29(5), 3343–3355. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2025.3532771 Hakim, U., De Felice, S., Pinti, P., Zhang, X., Noah, J. A., Ono, Y., Burgess, P. W., Hamilton, A., Hirsch, J., & Tachtsidis, I. (2023). Quantification of inter-brain coupling: A review of current methods used in haemodynamic and electrophysiological hyperscanning studies. NeuroImage, 280, 120354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage. 2023.120354 Heugel, N., Beardsley, S. A., & Liebenthal, E. (2022). Eeg and fmri coupling and decoupling based on joint independent component analysis (jica). Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 369, 109477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth. 2022.109477 Leeuwis, N., Yoon, S., & Alimardani, M. (2021). Functional connectivity analysis in motor-imagery brain computer interfaces. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.732946 Luo, H., Cai, Y., Lin, X., & Duan, L. (2024). Hyper-brain independent component analysis (hb-ica): An approach for detecting inter-brain networks from fnirs-hyperscanning data. Biomedical Optics Express, 16(1), 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.542554 Ma, Z.-Z., Wu, J.-J., Cao, Z., Hua, X.-Y., Zheng, M.-X., Xing, X.-X., Ma, J., & Xu, J.-G. (2024). Motor imagery-based brain–computer interface rehabilitation programs enhance upper extremity performance and cortical activation in stroke patients. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 21(1), 91. https://link.springer.com/article/ 10.1186/s12984-024-01387-w Pili, M. P., Provenzi, L., Billeci, L., Riva, V., Cassa, M., Siri, E., Procissi, G., Roberti, E., & Capelli, E. (2025). Exploring the impact of manual and automatic eeg pre-processing methods on interpersonal neural synchrony measures in parent-infant hyperscanning studies. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 417, 110400. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2025.110400 Richard, H., Ablin, P., Thirion, B., Gramfort, A., & Hyvarinen, A. (2021). Shared independent component analysis for multi-subject neuroimaging. Advances in neural information processing systems, 34, 29962–29971. https: //arxiv.org/abs/2110.13502 Šverko, Z., Vrankić, M., Vlahinić, S., & Rogelj, P. (2022). Complex pearson correlation coefficient for eeg connectivity analysis. Sensors, 22(4), 1477. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22041477 Yi, Y., Billor, N., Ekstrom, A., & Zheng, J. (2024). Cw_ica: An efficient dimensionality determination method for independent component analysis. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-49355-z
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jiaxuan Qin, Li Zhu; Xinlei Chen

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
