Alternative Vidhi to Conversion of Cyclic CNF->GNF

Authors

  • Avinash Bansal GNIT Mullana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24297/ijct.v3i1b.6778

Keywords:

GNF, Cyclic CNF, Automata, Normal Form, Grammar, Conversion CNF->GNF

Abstract

In automata theory Greibach Normal Form shows that A->aV

n*, where ‘a’ is terminal symbol and Vn is nonterminal symbol where * shows zero or more rates of Vn [1]. Most popular questions, conversion of following cyclic CNF into GNF are:

Question 1               S->AA | a,     A->SS | b

Question 2               S->AB,          A->BS | b,      B->SA | a

Question 3               S->AB,          A->BS | b,      B->AS | a      [1]

To solve these questions, we need two technical lemmas and required one or more another variable like Z1. In these questions, we have cyclic nature of production called cyclic CNF. We have modified the same rule by which we get the more reliable answer with less number of productions in right hand side without using lemmas and any another variable. This above method can be applied on all problems by which we produce the GNF.

 

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Avinash Bansal, GNIT Mullana

    CSE/IT

References

[1] K.L.P. Mishra, N. Chandrasekaran, Theory of Computation, PHI Third Edition, August, 2008.
[2] Greibach Normal Form Available: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greibach_normal_form

Downloads

Published

2012-08-01

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Alternative Vidhi to Conversion of Cyclic CNF->GNF. (2012). INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS & TECHNOLOGY, 3(1), 132-133. https://doi.org/10.24297/ijct.v3i1b.6778

Similar Articles

31-40 of 143

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.