https://rajpub.com/index.php/jssr en-US <p><a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" rel="license"><img src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" alt="Creative Commons License" /></a> All articles published in <em>Journal of Advances in Linguistics</em> are licensed under a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</a>.</p> editor@rajpub.com (Editorial Office) jssr@rajpub.com (Gurpreet Kaur) Tue, 04 Feb 2025 07:21:45 +0000 OJS 3.3.0.7 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 https://rajpub.com/index.php/jssr/article/view/9702 <p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Public policy shapes the economic landscape, influencing everything from corporate behavior to individual investment decisions. For Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) investors, these policy shifts can create opportunities and challenges as they navigate an ever-changing regulatory environment. The contrast between the Trump and Biden administrations offers a striking example of how differing political agendas can affect ESG investments. Trump’s first term was marked by deregulation and policies favoring fossil fuels, which created an uncertain environment for sustainable investments. When Biden assumed office, his focus on climate action and clean energy reinvigorated the ESG sector, offering a more stable and supportive landscape for green investments. However, with Trump’s return to power in his second term, these policies are being reversed again, leading to further volatility. This paper explores how such dramatic shifts in public policy influence economic strategies and directly impact ESG investors' decisions, forcing them to constantly reassess their portfolios in response to changing political climates.</span></p> Innocents Alhamis Copyright (c) 2025 Innocents Alhamis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://rajpub.com/index.php/jssr/article/view/9702 Tue, 04 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0000