� Law of Gravity

This essay introduces a realistic look at our laws of gravity, and the effects thereof, and it goes beyond to reveal how and by what gravity comes about in the fundamentals of nature upon which the earth and all spheres rest.

The correct expression should contain a summation.Summation is important when we want to find the cause of gravity, although in many practical applications we can forget the summation.Newton's gravity is: The first summation demands spherical symmetry in density and the second demands homogenous density.To speculate about the most general case we must use integrations instead.The integrations are in agreement to Newton's gravity but in a more general form.This effect can be regarded as caused by the existence of matter, and addition of more matter increases gravity in a linear way and superposition by summation is valid.LeSage's gravity looks almost the same: The difference is very small.Since we have substituted density by an attenuated flow of particles we can conclude that Le Sage's gravity should contain an exponential function of range that is missing in Newton's linear model.This means a very small deviation from linearity.Le Sage assumes an attenuation caused by matter, that is, a property of matter instead of by matter itself.Gravity is represented by those ether particles that are missing in the flow, since they are absorbed in the Sun.Since reduction in flow is proportional to flow itself we get an exponential decrease and we must integrate this exponential function along a direction representing the flow in two opposite directions before integration in relation the two angular variables.This means that the field of gravity according to Le Sage also has a maximal value, as we can see by assuming a very large mass in one direction and no mass in opposite direction.
We can describe this exponential relation easily by considering the field of gravity on the surface of a homogenous sphere.Newton's gravity is just a straight line with radius and density, but Le Sage's model is an exponential function, in relation to range, that goes asymptotically towards a maximal value.However this value is many orders of magnitude larger than the size on our planet.The deviation is therefore very small on our planet.With n as the number of particles we get for the homogenous sphere: In this way we regard the exponential relation.We can also reduce the effect of the Sun in proportion to how many particles are passing the Moon.This difference is expressed in relation to gravity on Earth.The effect has been expected to increase the indication in a gravimeter.This is not observable during the eclipse since the same effect acts on nearby parts of our planet.
Since the effect on our planet reaches over a larger region than the effect on the gravimeter mass we can observe two negative indications instead of one positive.Interaction between different parts of our planet can explain this phenomenon.Therefore, the Wang eclipse, observed in China 1997, supports the idea that linear gravity according to Newton and Einstein is only an approximation to pushing (and exponential) gravity, as explained by Fatio and LeSage.It was therefore correct of Newton not to build a hypothesis on this approximation.The Fatio/LeSage model can be united with the speed c of ether particles and apparent zero speed of gravity in itself in relation to the source of gravity.The particle model for gravity predicts no aberration in solar gravity.This follows from the fact that the ether has a property to be super fluid and the Earth generates a wave function in the ether.An observer on the Earth (in free fall) will only see the planets own gravity.Gravity becomes a stationary condition in relation to Earth.This means, the difference between the flows in two opposite directions called 'falling' ether.This vertical ether wind is many orders of magnitude smaller than c the speed of individual ether particles.Observed gravity is therefore a condition that is constant and stationary in relation to our free falling planet.This explains why we cannot observe any aberration in gravity from our sun.Gravity is produced by mass in ether particles and light waves in the polarization of these particles.
The gravity model according to Fatio and LeSage implies a maximal value on the force of gravity (That perhaps can have relevance for the existence of black holes).Another implication is a vertical ether wind that can explain cosmological red shift without Big Bang.The cosmological red shift is not considered here to be caused by the celestial body itself, but by the ether surrounding the body and Big Bang can be an illusion.
The simple form of Newton's law is misleading.Gravity produces spherical symmetry so we can handle gravity.This means, however, that it is difficult to understand gravity.Gravity means also that it is difficult to measure two-way light speed in vertical direction.Such an effect is real as is demonstrated in [1], where we also can see that the ether wind causes a first order effect (called local time in error) in the GPS system (Sagnac effect) and a second order effect in atomic clocks (called time dilation in error).We can also see in [1] that the separation between the two negative bumps is at least two times too big to be explained by the corona of the Sun.

Reference [1]
John-Erik Persson, The Falling Ether, NPA proceedings 2013 available at www.worldsci.org/people/john-erik_perssonPS I have a hope that this article can provoke some people to state a different opinion.Perhaps some people also will be interested enough to take look at [1], where more details is available.

PPS
The interpretation of the Wang eclipse given here implies that the small of the form of our planet should be caused during an eclipse.An interesting question is therefore a consequence.Are these changes of the form of our planet large enough to be detected by VLBI measurements?